• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
    • “Let the Choir Have a Voice” (Essay)
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

A Suggestion for Ordinary Form Masses

Jeff Ostrowski · October 29, 2024

LONG WITH MANY others, I have insisted that the Traditional Latin Mass (a.k.a. “MISSALE VESTUSTUM”) is very important for the continuity of the Catholic Church. It’s an intensely pure and holy rite. Moreover, nobody’s been able to point out anything deficient about it. Needless to say, that doesn’t mean every priest who offers the TLM is perfect. Nor does it mean every single Catholic who attends the Extraordinary Form is perfect, or even a decent human being. Some have argued that a higher percentage of Catholics who attend the TLM “take their faith seriously.” That may or may not be true—but such a discussion will have to wait for another day. Today, I have a suggestion to make.

Rediscovery! • In the 1990s, when the MISSALE VESTUSTUM was being rediscovered, there were some problems. For instance, many of the older missals didn’t contain the 1962 modifications. As a result, some priests weren’t offering Mass according to the “pure” 1962 Missal.1 Some priests, for example, read the Gospel sotto voce before the Deacon sang it during Solemn Mass. Other priests allowed a third CONFITEOR before Communion. Still others used the “wrong” books for Holy Week.

Good Liturgical Praxis • An unfortunate result still lingers from those early days. To be blunt, the altar boys were often confused. During Holy Week, for example, what seemed like 15 minutes would elapse while the altar boy figured out which book or item was needed, went and grabbed it, and (finally) carried it to the priest. Sometimes the altar boy forgot to bow—so he’d grab the item back, bow, kiss the priest’s hand, then give it back. A good altar boy would have had that item waiting. The idea developed that having the priest wait 15 minutes for an item (or book) he needs is “good and reverent” liturgy. But that’s false. Indeed, a well-trained MASTER OF CEREMONIES keeps 1-2 steps ahead of the priest, anticipating what comes next and keeping things running smoothly.

Mutual Enrichment • In the MISSALE VESTUSTUM, the Deacon carries the Burse (containing the Corporal) to the Altar while the Creed is being sung by the choir:

My Suggestion • I have a suggestion for the Ordinary Form. I believe whoever’s going to read the petitions for the “Prayer of the Faithful” (a.k.a. BIDDING PRAYERS) ought to leave his seat during the CREED. He should open the book and be ready to play ball when CREED ends. I’d love to know whether you agree with me. “Reverent liturgy” doesn’t mean sitting there waiting for people to get into position when they ought to have done that already.

1  Some idiot will probably claim I’m expressing an opinion or preference vis-à-vis the 1962 rubrics. But literate people know better. I’m not expressing an opinion here; I’m merely describing what took place.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Bidding Prayers in the Ordinary Form, Missale Vetustum, Prayer of the Faithful Last Updated: October 29, 2024

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Music List • “Ascension of the Lord”
    Readers have expressed interest in seeing the ORDER OF MUSIC I created for the The Ascension of the Lord—“Festum Ascensionis Domini”—which is transferred to 17 May 2026 in our diocese. Please feel free to download it as a PDF file if such a thing interests you. The OFFERTORY (“Ascéndit Deus in jubilatióne”) is particularly beautiful and the ENTRANCE CHANT is simply splendid. As always, readers may go directly to the flourishing feasts website, where the complete Propria Missae may be downloaded free of charge.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • “For Pentecost Sunday”
    Yesterday morning, I recorded myself singing the ENTRANCE CHANT for Pentecost Sunday while simultaneously accompanying myself on the pipe organ. Click here to see how that came out. At the end of the antiphon, there’s a triple Allelúja and I just love the chord at the end of the 2nd iteration. The organ accompaniment—along with the musical score for singers—can be downloaded free of charge at the flourishing feasts website. For the record, the antiphon on Pentecost Sunday doesn’t come from a psalm; it comes from the book of Wisdom.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • “Organ Accompaniment”
    Over the past few years, I’ve been harmonizing all the vernacular plainsong Introit settings by the CHAUMONOT COMPOSERS GROUP. This coming Sunday—10 May 2026—is the 6th Sunday of Easter (Year A). The following declaration will probably smack of “blowing my own horn.” However, I’d rank this accompaniment as my best yet. In this rehearsal video, I attempt to sing it while simultaneously accompanying myself on the pipe organ. The musical score [for singers] as well as my organ accompaniment can be downloaded free of charge from the flourishing feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Thee” + “Thou” + “Thine”
    Few musicians realize that various English translations of Sacred Scripture were granted formal approval by the USCCB and the Vatican for liturgical use in the United States of America. But don’t take my word for it! Here are four documents proving this, which you can examine with your own eyes. Some believe the words “Thine” and “Thou” and “Thee” were forbidden after Vatican II—but that’s incorrect. For example, they’re found in the English translation of the ‘Our Father’ at Mass. Moreover, the Revised Standard Version (Catholic Edition) mentioned in those four documents employs “Thine” and “Thou” and “Thee.” It was published with a FOREWORD by Westminster’s Roman Catholic Archbishop (John Cardinal Heenan).
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Reminder” — Month of May (2026)
    On a daily basis, I speak to people who don’t realize we publish a free newsletter (although they’ve followed our blog for years). We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and refuse to run annoying ads. As a result, our mailing list is crucial to our survival. It couldn’t be easier to subscribe! Just scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Simplified Version • “Canon in D” (Pachelbel)
    I published an article on 11 November 2023 called Wedding March For The Lazy Organist, which rather offhandedly made reference to a simplified version I created in 2007 for Pachelbel’s Canon. I often use it as a PROCESSIONAL for weddings and quinceañeras. Many organists say they “hate” Pachelbel’s Canon. But I love it. I think it’s bright and beautiful. I created that ‘simplified version’ for musicians coming to grips with playing the pipe organ. It can be downloaded as a free PDF if you visit Andrea Leal’s article dated 15 August 2022: Manuals Only: Organ Interludes Based on Plainsong. Specifically, it is page 84 in that collection—generously offered as a free PDF download. Johann Pachelbel (d. 1706) was a renowned German organist, violinist, teacher, and composer of over 500 works. A friend of Bach’s family, he taught Johann Christoph Bach (Sebastian Bach’s eldest brother) and lived in his house. Those who read Pachelbel’s biography will notice his connection to two German cities adopted as famous hymn tune names: EISENACH and ERFURT.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

On March 24th, 1945, Pope Pius XII, by the Motu Proprio “In cotidianis precibus” gave permission to all who recite the divine office to use a new version of the Psalter made by six Jesuit professors of the Biblical Institute. This, contrary to some expectations, was neither a revision of the existing Vulgate nor of Saint Jerome’s ‘Psalterium juxta Hebraeos’, but a new translation altogether, based on the Massoretic text, the versions, and (in a few instances) on conjectural emendations.

— Dr. T. E. Bird

Recent Posts

  • Music List • “Ascension of the Lord”
  • Call For Submissions! • ‘Usus Antiquior’ in Contemporary Catholicism (October 2026)
  • Inspiring Paper from a Graduating High School Senior
  • Entrance Chant • Before or After Opening Hymn?
  • “Unfair Characterization” • (But Good Question)

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Footer

CONTACT • Corpus Christi Watershed

1 (747) 218-8005
chabanel.psalms@gmail.com
Corpus Christi Watershed
8118 Etienne Dr
Corpus Christi, TX 78414

Copyright © 2026 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization recognized by the state of Texas on 19 October 2006. Our statement of purpose notes that we “employ the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.”