• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Dr. Hamilton • “Totally Random (But Hopefully Not Useless) Thoughts About Choirs”

Dr. Gregory Hamilton · April 20, 2024

T HAS BEEN A WHILE since I’ve been able to post, and I apologize for that. Readers, perhaps remember that I am blessed to serve as choirmaster for the Basilica of Saint Joseph in Macon (Georgia) where my parish choir sings Alstott, Elgar, White, Russian Orthodox music, Lotti, Hurford, Perosi, Fauré, Vaughn Williams, Arcadelt, Vivaldi, and works composed by your humble correspondent. Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, one of my favorites, wrote in 1985: “The only really effective apologia for Christianity comes down to two arguments: namely, the saints the Church has produced and the art which has grown in her womb.” It seemed appropriate therefore, to share some thoughts about preparing music for the liturgy, rehearsing, and the like. I hope somebody out there finds some of these useful.

The importance of Choirs and Choral Singing • The Church in Her wisdom has continually though the centuries affirmed the absolute value of choirs and choral singing:

§ 114. “… Choirs must be diligently promoted, especially in cathedral churches…”

— SACROSANCTUM CONCILIUM 1963

§ 19. “Because of the liturgical ministry it performs, the choir—or the Capella musica, or schola cantorum—deserves particular mention. Its role has become something of yet greater importance and weight by reason of the norms of the Council concerning the liturgical renewal. Its duty is, in effect, to ensure the proper performance of the parts which belong to it, according to the different kinds of music sung…

Therefore:

(a) There should be choirs, or Capellae, or scholae cantorum, especially in cathedrals and other major churches,…and they should be carefully encouraged.

(b) It would also be desirable for similar choirs to be set up in smaller churches.

§ 20. Large choirs (Capellae musicae) existing in basilicas, cathedrals, monasteries and other major churches, which have in the course of centuries earned for themselves high renown by preserving and developing a musical heritage of inestimable value, should be retained for sacred celebrations of a more elaborate kind, according to their own traditional norms, recognized and approved by the Ordinary.”

— MUSICAM SACRAM 1967

“…And when a choir exists, which can draw the congregation into the cosmic praise and into the wide open space of heaven and earth more strongly than the congregation’s own stammering is able to do, then precisely in that moment the delegated, representative function of the choir is especially appropriate and fitting. Through the choir, a greater transparency toward the praise of angels is rendered possible and therefore a more profound interior participation in the singing, than would be possible in many places through one’s own crying and singing.”
— Pope Benedict XVI

The Liturgy and Concerts • Speaking form some personal experience, I have had the impression sometimes that certain musicians think about a concert differently than a liturgy. As music director of a large church, I often hire professional musicians—trumpet players or string players for example. Most are very professional, come prepared, and do a great job. Our parish is blessed to be situated near a University (Mercer University) that has a fine music department. I am happy to report that the young people we hire have all been excellent and do give us hope for this present generation.

Give God Our Best • However, some ‘professional’ musicians I can tell do not practice or prepare for the Liturgy and the reason either implied or given is “it’s just a church gig”. In addition, I have had cantors who are quite lackadaisical about preparing their music for the liturgy, week after week. It does not seem to matter whether some people are paid or not.  It is a very disrespectful attitude to “wing it” or just not care. So…let us be clear. I believe that the Sacred Liturgy is as, or MORE important than a concert—doesn’t it seem appropriate to honor Christ by doing our best?

As I say, it does not seem to matter whether someone is a “paid professional” or an “amateur”. Some of the MOST DEDICATED musical people I have known have never been paid a penny for many years of devotion in choral singing. While I was living in Houston, we had an elderly lady in the parish choir who quietly announced that next month would mark her 50th year of singing in the choir. Of course, we had to honor her with a party! Such people, though they often have minimal training are quite valuable. One of the joys of what we do is seeing people grow musically through the years. Through (I admit not always) patient teaching and coaching, singers can and do improve their skills—at reading music, sight-reading, matching pitch, and general vocal skills. After all, when we hopefully get to heaven, we are going to need all our singing skills!

Preparing and Rehearsing Music • In preparing music in rehearsal however, there is a marked difference depending on whom you are rehearsing with. You must tailor your rehearsal plans and style taking into account who your choristers are. If you have the privilege of having a skilled professional choir, You can almost “just throw music at them” and they produce the product with minimal direction. As well, conducting such a group is more “reminding” than an invasive every-cue, every-beat style. Amateurs however, vary widely and wildly in their skills and musical abilities. Some do not read music at all and learn “note for note by rote”. Some are quite skilled. To my surprise, with amateurs, if you don’t give a cue, they sometimes don’t even come in… “Why did not you come in on time?” — “Well, you didn’t show us!” Sometimes it is necessary to over conduct NOT in making larger gestures, but in cuing ALL entrances if you can, all dynamics, being extra-clear about tempo, etc. This also becomes quite entertaining when doing it from the organ console.

Accompaniment at Rehearsal • It’s a rather tricky thing to learn how to gauge rehearsal time so as not to totally bore the more skilled members (while you go over EVERY note with June the alto) while still making to do what’s needed to bring the lesser skilled members up to the rest of the group standard. Sometimes sectional rehearsals—breaking up the tenors and basses for example in one group and the altos and sopranos in another room (no soprano jokes please) are useful for this (especially if you have an assistant musician or a choir member who can play one part at a time at the piano). Amateurs must hear their part to be able to learn it and sing it confidently. I once sang with a well-known conductor who did not use a piano or organ to rehearse with. That may work with a very skilled choir, but for the amateur group he was rehearsing with it was a disaster, the members could not learn their parts without an objective aural reference of some kind. I used to suggest to members that they needed to work on their part at home before coming to rehearsal. While this is good instruction, I gradually realized that some do not read music well enough to do this on their own. This prompted the establishment of a series of summer “basic fundamentals” music classes, when the choirs are not singing. For five weeks in the summer, we go through music notation, elementary theory and vocal production.1

Awareness of the Beat • However, it is possible to train amateurs to follow you. One exercise I do is the “metronome rubato”: I stand in front of the choir and I tell them that they have to sing the word “tick” at every beat I give. Starting very slowly, I then beat a three or four pattern, and they sing “tick” at every beat. Then I speed up, slow down and alter the tempo, still making them watch me and singing “tick” at every beat. The purpose of this little exercise is to train a default watching of the conductor and an awareness of the beat. Choristers have to internalize this awareness of the beat, especially during rests.

Repertoire must be carefully chosen for the amateur choir. Thankfully, there is a great wealth of (often free online!) music available of high quality for lesser skilled choirs, including two-part works. If each section is not strong on its own yet, singing two part music (SA on top part, TB on second part) can be a useful stepping stone. There is never any reason to sing poor music!

What is Active Participation? • While I am on this subject, let me beat one of my favorite drums. I hope in our age, we will see the resurrection of at least some of the great wealth of the canon of sacred music – particularly the incredibly rich repertoire of sung Masses that have been composed for the Liturgy over so many centuries. There seems to be an idea that the congregation at every mass has to sing all the Mass ordinary parts. This I believe is erroneous and not what the framers of Vatican II meant by active participation. There is nothing wrong with learning a beautiful polyphonic Gloria for the Mass…

“…the parts of the Ordinary of the Mass can be divided between the choir and the people…”

— MUSICAM SACRAM 1967

I one had a rector of a seminary tell me “ It’s no great loss if we never sing that music in the Liturgy, you can sing it for a concert”. ARGGG. This wealth of repertoire is possibly the churches’ greatest contribution to western musical culture. The canon of Masses by Byrd, Mozart, Haydn, Schubert (fill in your favorite composer) represent the high point of our western culture. To relegate them to a concert, where the purpose it not primarily to glorify God—the ORIGINAL PURPOSE of such repertoire…seems just pitiful. Lecture over.

It’s also quite possible to teach amateurs to sing Gregorian Chant. Explaining the neumes and the Solemes style of notation will prove to be rewarding in the end, as it opens up a wealth of chant repertoire for the choir. Let us continue with Faith…and patience.

1 A most useful book I would recommend for teaching music fundamentals is “How to Read Music” by Roger Evans.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: April 22, 2024

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Dr. Gregory Hamilton

Dr. Gregory Hamilton is a composer and performer currently on the faculty of Holy Trinity Seminary in Dallas TX.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
    EARS BEFORE truly revolutionary changes were introduced by the post-conciliar reformers, Evelyn Waugh wrote (on 16 August 1964) to John Cardinal Heenan: “I think that a vociferous minority has imposed itself on the hierarchy and made them believe that a popular demand existed where there was in fact not even a preference.” We ask the kind reader— indeed, we beg you—to realize that those of us born in the 1940s and 1950s had no cognizance of Roman activities during the 1960s and 1970s. We were concerned with making sure we had the day’s bus fare, graduating from high school, taking care of our siblings, learning a trade, getting a job, courting a spouse. We questioned neither the nuns nor the Church.1 Do not believe for one instant any of us were following the liturgical machinations of Cardinal Lercaro or Father Bugnini in real time. Setting The Stage • To never question or resist Church authorities is praiseworthy. On the other hand, when a scandalous situation persists for decades, it must be brought into focus. Our series will do precisely that as we discuss the Lectionary Scandal from a variety of angles. We don’t do this to attack the Catholic Church. Our goal is bringing to light what’s been going on, so it can be fixed once and for all. Our subject is extremely knotty and difficult to navigate. Its complexity helps explain why the situation has persisted for such a long time.2 But if we immediately get “into the weeds” we’ll lose our audience. Therefore, it seems better to jump right in. So today, we’ll explore the legality of selling these texts. A Word On Copyright • Suppose Susie modifies a paragraph by Edgar Allan Poe. That doesn’t mean ipso facto she can assert copyright on it. If Susie takes a picture of a Corvette and uses Photoshop to color the tires blue, that doesn’t mean she henceforth “owns” all Corvettes in America. But when it comes to Responsorial Psalm translations, certain parties have been asserting copyright over them, selling them for a profit, and bullying publishers vis-à-vis hymnals and missals. Increasingly, Catholics are asking whether these translations are truly under copyright—because they are identical (or substantially identical) to other translations.3 Example After Example • Our series will provide copious examples supporting our claims. Sometimes we’ll rely on the readership for assistance, because—as we’ve stressed—our subject’s history couldn’t be more convoluted. There are countless manuscripts (in Greek, Hebrew, and Latin) we don’t have access to, so it would be foolish for us to claim that our observations are somehow the ‘final word’ on anything. Nevertheless, we demand accountability. Catholics in the pews are the ones who paid for all this. We demand to know who specifically made these decisions (which impact every English-speaking Catholic) and why specifically certain decisions were made. The Responsorial Psalms used in America are—broadly speaking—stolen from the hard work of others. In particular, they borrowed heavily from Father Cuthbert Lattey’s 1939 PSALTER TRANSLATION:
    *  PDF Download • COMPARISON CHART —We thank the CCW staff for technical assistance with this graph.
    Analysis • Although certain parties have been selling (!!!) that translation for decades, the chart demonstrates it’s not a candidate for copyright since it “borrows” or “steals” or “rearranges” so much material from other translations, especially the 1939 translation by Father Cuthbert Lattey. What this means in layman’s terms is that individuals have been selling a translation under false pretenses, a translation they don’t own (although they claim to). To make RESTITUTION, all that money will have to be returned. A few years ago, the head of ICEL gave a public speech in which he said they give some of “their” profits to the poor. While almsgiving is a good thing, it cannot justify theft. Our Constant Theme • Our series will be held together by one thread, which will be repeated constantly: “Who was responsible?” Since 1970, the conduct of those who made a profit by selling these sacred texts has been repugnant. Favoritism was shown toward certain entities—and we will document that with written proof. It is absolutely essential going forward that the faithful be told who is making these decisions. Moreover, vague justifications can no longer be accepted. If we’re told they are “making the translations better,” we must demand to know what specifically they’re doing and what specific criteria they’re following. Stay Tuned • If you’re wondering whether we’ll address the forthcoming (allegedly) Lectionary and the so-called ABBEY PSALMS AND CANTICLES, have no fear. We’ll have much to say about both. Please stay tuned. We believe this will end up being the longest series of articles ever submitted to Corpus Christi Watershed. To be continued. ROBERT O’NEILL Former associate of Monsignor Francis “Frank” P. Schmitt at Boys Town in Nebraska JAMES ARNOLD Formerly associated w/ King’s College, Cambridge A convert to the Catholic Church, and distant relative of J. H. Arnold MARIA B. Currently serves as a musician in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Charlotte. Those aware of the situation in her diocese won’t be surprised she chose to withhold her last name.
    1 Even if we’d been able to obtain Roman journals such as NOTITIAE, none of them contained English translations. But such an idea would never have occurred to a high school student or a college student growing up in the 1960s. 2 A number of shell corporations claim to own the various biblical translations mandated for Roman Catholics. They’ve made millions of dollars selling (!) these indulgenced texts. If time permits, we hope to enumerate these various shell corporations and explain: which texts they claim to own; how much they bring in each year; who runs them; and so forth. It would also be good to explore the morality of selling these indulgenced texts for a profit. Furthermore, for the last fifty years these organizations have employed several tactics to manipulate and bully others. If time permits, we will expose those tactics (including written examples). Some of us—who have been working on this problem for three decades—have amassed written documentation we’ll be sharing that demonstrates behavior at best “shady” and at worst criminal. 3 Again, we are not yet examining the morality of selling (!) indulgenced texts to Catholics mandated to use those same translations.
    —Guest Author
    “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time (27 July 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the the feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
    All of the chants for 27 July 2025 have been added to the feasts website, as usual under a convenient “drop down” menu. The COMMUNION ANTIPHON (both text and melody) are exceedingly beautiful and ancient.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“The idea that the Roman basilica is the ideal design for a Christian church building because it made it possible for the priest and the people to face one another is complete nonsense. That would have been the last thing that the early Christians had in mind.”

— Father Louis Bouyer

Recent Posts

  • PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
  • “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
  • Flor Peeters In A Weird Mood?
  • Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
  • Jeff’s Mother Joins Our Fundraiser

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up