• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Real Life in a Large Church Choir Program (Part II)

Keven Smith · June 15, 2020

S I explained in my last article, I’m writing a series of pieces on my music program at St. Stephen the First Martyr Catholic Church in Sacramento, California. We have more than 30 active members in our choir, including a wonderful new tenor who just dropped out of the sky and joined us a couple weeks ago (don’t you love it when that happens….once every 10 years?).

I spent most of my last article describing my Thursday afternoon Beginners class, which gives children ages 4-7 an introduction to music in general and singing in particular. It involves puppets. Now, I’ll walk you through how I approach teaching the next two levels of young musicians.

Level 1: Sound Before Sight

The next two hours of my Thursday consist of classes for children ages 8 and up. Based on musical aptitude rather than age, I split the children into classes that I’ve brilliantly called Level 1 and Level 2. In Level 1, we move beyond the folk songs and storytelling of Beginners and get into more serious musical concepts. Over the years, I’ve incorporated bits of pedagogy from several different sources, and I’m always open to new influences.

One of the overarching goals for Levels 1 and 2 is to improve the students’ ability to audiate. According to the Gordon Institute for Musical Learning:

Audiation is the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. One may audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music.

The key word there is “comprehend.” When children start being able to audiate “DO” while they’re singing in a major key (or “LA” while they’re singing in a minor key), the music begins to make more sense to them and they can sing better in tune. From there, they can start recognizing common patterns of notes (such as DO-MI-SOL). Music starts to feel less and less like a guessing game.

To this end, I’ve made heavy use of the tonal and rhythm patterns in Music Learning Theory (MLT) almost from the get-go. But more recently, I became convinced that while it’s important for children to be able to recognize and sing tonal patterns, they really need a strong foundation in the scale first. So I’ve drawn from the principles of Dalcroze solfege to drill the students in solfege scales as well as dichords (note pairs in the scale) and trichords (groups of three consecutive notes in the scale). This “grunt work” gives the children a solid grounding in the inner workings of the scale. From there, we can ease into the patterns by singing scales but leaving out certain notes.

I round out Level 1 classes with many fun and challenging exercises from John Feierabend’s Conversational Solfege curriculum as well as vocal warmups, breathing training, instruction in forming beautiful Latin vowels, and singing hymns by rote. Notice that I haven’t mentioned sight-singing. Call me an extremist, but I rarely cover any musical notation in Level 1. I’m convinced that many teachers introduce notation too early, before the students’ ears are adequately trained, so I prefer to save notation for Level 2. This is subject to change in future schoolyears, but so far, I haven’t regretted my careful approach.

Level 2: Sight Supports Sound

Level 2 picks up where Level 1 left off. In some respects it’s the same class, only harder:

  • I use more challenging tonal and rhythm patterns from MLT.
  • The Dalcroze solfege scales don’t necessarily start on DO—they’ll start on a mystery note, and I’ll ask the kids to label the syllables based on where the whole steps and half steps fell.
  • I choose more challenging hymns for the children to learn, and they also start learning some of the simpler motets that our choir sings.

But the highlight of Level 2 is that we finally start learning notation—and because the students’ ears are already well trained, the notation actually makes sense. Week by week, I walk the kids through the theory and various neumes of chant notation. Most of them have the advantage of having heard Mass ordinaries and other commonly used chants in our parish since their birth—so when we study Mass XI (Orbis factor), they hardly even need to look at the notes of the distinctive Kyrie.

As for teaching modern notation, I’ve had good results with the LISTEN! program produced by GIA Publications. The beauty of LISTEN! is that it starts off simple, teaching singers to identify and sing from the page the simple tonic, dominant, and subdominant patterns they’ve already learned by ear. What’s already in a student’s audiation is relatively easy to sing from the page—just as a child learning to read printed words has the advantage of already having heard words such as CAT, DOG, MOM, and DAD hundreds of times.

Another key element of Level 2 is training in the traditional Latin Mass. Using The Latin Mass Explained by Msgr. George Moorman as my support, I spend a couple minutes of each class explaining a part of the Mass to students—from the point of view of a choir member. My goal is not to offer thorough catechesis; rather, I aim to help them understand the “flow” of a sung Mass and the importance of each piece of music they’ll sing during that Mass.

By the end of their Level 2 schoolyear, students should be ready to become Junior Choristers, who are one step away from singing in the parish choir. I’ll describe our Choristers program in my next article.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Catholic Youth Choirs, Gregorian Chant, Latin Mass Last Updated: June 16, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Keven Smith

Keven Smith, music director at St. Stephen the First Martyr, lives in Sacramento with his wife and five musical children.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
    Father Adrian Porter, using the cracher dans la soupe example, did a praiseworthy job explaining the difference between ‘dynamic’ and ‘formal’ translation. This is something Monsignor Ronald Knox explained time and again—yet even now certain parties feign ignorance. I suppose there will always be people who pretend the only ‘valid’ translation of Mitigásti omnem iram tuam; avertísti ab ira indignatiónis tuæ… would be “You mitigated all ire of you; you have averted from your indignation’s ire.” Those who would defend such a translation suffer from an unfortunate malady. One of my professors called it “cognate on the brain.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
    Father Cuthbert Lattey (d. 1954) wrote: “In a large number of cases the ancient Christian versions and some other ancient sources seem to have been based upon a better Hebrew text than that adopted by the rabbis for official use and alone suffered to survive. Sometimes, too, the cognate languages suggest a suitable meaning for which there is little or no support in the comparatively small amount of ancient Hebrew that has survived. The evidence of the metre is also at times so clear as of itself to furnish a strong argument; often it is confirmed by some other considerations. […] The Jewish copyists and their directors, however, seem to have lost the tradition of the metre at an early date, and the meticulous care of the rabbis in preserving their own official and traditional text (the ‘massoretic’ text) came too late, when the mischief had already been done.” • Msgr. Knox adds: “It seems the safest principle to follow the Latin—after all, St. Jerome will sometimes have had a better text than the Massoretes—except on the rare occasions when there is no sense to be extracted from the Vulgate at all.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • 9 Nov. (Dedic. Lateran)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 9 November 2025, which is the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica. If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the sensational feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Reminder” — Month of November (2025)
    On a daily basis, I speak to people who don’t realize we publish a free newsletter (although they’ve followed our blog for years). We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and refuse to run annoying ads. As a result, our mailing list is crucial to our survival. Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“A theologian who does not love art, poetry, music and nature can be dangerous since blindness and deafness toward the beautiful are not incidental: they are necessarily reflected in his theology.”

— Josef Cardinal Ratzinger (Interview, 1985)

Recent Posts

  • ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
  • Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
  • Goofy 1974 Hymn • “A Man Can Kill With a Gun, a Bomb, or a Lance”
  • They did a terrible thing
  • What surprised me about regularly singing the Gloria in Latin

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.